Which of the following is not a basic characteristic of a well-designed evaluation system?

A well-designed evaluation system typically includes fundamental features that enhance its effectiveness and reliability. One of these critical characteristics is clear performance criteria, which serve as benchmarks against which the performance can be measured. These criteria ensure that assessments can be objective, transparent, and aligned with the goals of the evaluation.

Staff involvement in the design of the evaluation system is also essential. Engaging the people who will actually use or be evaluated by the system helps gather valuable insights and increases buy-in, leading to more effective implementation. This collaborative approach ensures that the system is tailored to meet the specific needs of the organization or the evaluation context.

Automated data collection further enhances an evaluation system by increasing efficiency, accuracy, and speed in gathering and processing information. This automation helps to minimize human error and ensures that timely data is available for analysis.

In contrast, having systems update master files directly does not align with the basic characteristics of a well-designed evaluation system. While maintaining up-to-date records is important, direct updates to master files can lead to inaccuracies, lack of accountability, and potential data integrity issues. It is more critical for a well-designed system to have controlled and deliberate processes for updating information to ensure that all changes are tracked and verified.